Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Holger Rune Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Rune analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Holger Rune Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wild 0 - 0 Rune
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 48.51% of points on his second serve, while Rune has won 54.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 50.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rune has won 49.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.73% and 27.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 66.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rune has saved 68.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 61.11% of matches played (W/L 44/ 28), with Rune winning 57.14% (W/L 36/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 191/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Rune has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 60/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 40/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16), where as Rune has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.74 while Rune has played against players with an average rank of 142.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rune has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 42.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rune has converted 34.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
58
Rank
58
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
13
Rank
4
High
21
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
57% (225-170)
Career Total W/L
66% (224-116)
52% (16-15)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$668,565
Career Prize Money
$5,763,560
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Holger Rune |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (16/15) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (41/35) | 60% (44/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (368/354) | 52% (375/352) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 67% (10/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 157 | 192 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 93 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:47 | 2:1:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192 | 177.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1490/2364) | 61% (1423/2332) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1052/1490) | 73% (1044/1423) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (424/874) | 55% (497/909) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (80/188) | 34% (61/178) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (787/2176) | 36% (810/2279) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 73% (11/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (5/9) | 71% (12/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (16/30) | 67% (18/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 88% (14/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 25% (12/3) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
68 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
65%
(
31 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Gregoire Barrere
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Luca Nardi
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
13
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Taylor Fritz
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Holger Rune Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Luca Nardi
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Holger Rune
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
86 of
131)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Holger Rune
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
19 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
70%
(
94 of
135)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(9) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Holger Rune
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Rune Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Thiago Seyboth Wild
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
